Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Diack: False Start Rule Stays

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member kitkat1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    10,679

    Diack: False Start Rule Stays

    'No Chance' of Rule Change, IAAF Chief Says

    By REUTERS

    Published: September 3, 2011 at 3:33 AM ET


    DAEGU, South Korea (Reuters) - Athletics chief Lamine Diack maintained the hardest of lines on Saturday, telling Reuters there would be no changing or bending of the rules to prevent big names being disqualified.




    "No chance," the International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF) president said in an interview at the Daegu world championships.

    The start of the championships was marred by the disqualification of two of the sport's biggest names on technicalities, depriving fans and broadcasters of the chance to see the greatest names in the biggest races.

    The world's fastest man Usain Bolt was scratched from the 100 meters final for making a false start under the IAAF's one-false-start-and-you're-out rule.

    A day later, Cuba's Dayron Robles was dramatically stripped of his 110 meters hurdles gold medal for bumping China's Liu Xiang along the track.

    The rules are the rules, Diack stressed, and they are good ones. He said that the biggest eye-opener of the championships so far had been Bolt's disqualification but that he had seen nothing to persuade him any rules needed changing.

    "I think it was Bolt disqualified by false start, I did not expect this," he chuckled, when asked what had surprised him most about these Games.

    "(But) I work for this rule. I like very much this rule, I vote for having this rule.

    "(In the past) all athletes have the possibility to have one (false start), so you can have eight," he said, warming to his theme in a suite of the south-east Korean city's Inter-Burgo hotel.

    "Think about television... it was disturbing to have everybody able to make a false start.

    "After that we said 'one'. And we see that some are making it voluntarily and still stay in the competition. So now we say we do not want one voluntarily disturbing the competition.

    "So I am happy with the rule," he added, stressing there was "no chance" of changing it.

    "He (Bolt) understands that because he made a false start and immediately he takes off his T-shirt and says 'ok I go out'."

    The 78-year-old Senegalese was equally dismissive of any suggestions of leniency for burly world record holder and Olympic champion Robles in the traditionally physical 110 meters hurdles.

    "I am in favor (of the disqualification).

    "If he obstructs Liu he has to be disqualified. But not to ask the others to re-run. I don't know why you ask the others of the eight to run because Mr Robles obstruct Mr Liu.

    "He has to be out... it is the rule."

    (Editing by John O'Brien)


    Connect with The New York Times

  2. #2
    Senior Member kitkat1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    10,679
    Interesting that Diack confirms the no-break start rule was brought in primarily for television... but I'd rather watch the tension build in the sprints than see the third heat of the 800m in the heptathlon plod around. If TV wants to save time and stick more advertisements into their coverage, do it when the no-hopers are trundling around.

  3. #3
    I agree with the elimination of the first rule... That was ridiculous. The second rule... Allowing only one start was fair. The introduction of the current rule was bad move... It's bad that many have to be punished for the stupidity of a few. Oh well, life goes on.

  4. #4
    and he can go suck himself

  5. #5
    people don't cry, it's good rule

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Linas View Post
    people don't cry, it's good rule
    It's a bullshit rule. The 100m is a sport determined by speed and they are saying that athletes have to hold back for the happiness of TV audiences and commercial interests. The athletes are being hurt to sell more ad revenue. That's bullshit. It's not sports. And it will hurt them down the road when nobody sees the biggest names in the sport finishing a race. Then they'll rescind it because it ends up costing them money. Still the wrong reason but at least the athletes won't be hurt for the glee of the spectators and channel owners.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by lylemcd View Post
    It's a bullshit rule. The 100m is a sport determined by speed and they are saying that athletes have to hold back for the happiness of TV audiences and commercial interests. The athletes are being hurt to sell more ad revenue. That's bullshit. It's not sports. And it will hurt them down the road when nobody sees the biggest names in the sport finishing a race. Then they'll rescind it because it ends up costing them money. Still the wrong reason but at least the athletes won't be hurt for the glee of the spectators and channel owners.
    I know it's sad what's happened with Bolt, but I think he won't repeat FS anymore. My main reason is that it prevents gamesmanship. The race starts when the gun goes off and not before. Guessing the gun is cheating. In swimming no problem. Train for it, wait for the gun sound and run! How many times Asafa Powell FS? He ran many races

  8. #8
    Member Lo Hill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by Linas View Post
    I know it's sad what's happened with Bolt, but I think he won't repeat FS anymore. My main reason is that it prevents gamesmanship. The race starts when the gun goes off and not before. Guessing the gun is cheating. In swimming no problem. Train for it, wait for the gun sound and run! How many times Asafa Powell FS? He ran many races
    How can that be cheating? Its a gamble....just like Blackjack, slots and casino play. Do you get kicked out of a casino if you win a bunch of money?

    If you are going to have the one false start rule, then any time after the gun goes off should be a legal start...no reacting 0.10 seconds after the gun.

  9. #9
    Member sady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    wherever the wind blows
    Posts
    765
    Quote Originally Posted by Lo Hill View Post

    If you are going to have the one false start rule, then any time after the gun goes off should be a legal start...no reacting 0.10 seconds after the gun.
    I do not disagree with that. Maybe there is scientific evidence but the same also said we had reached the limits of human speed. Under 9.6 is not humanly possible.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    750
    Quote Originally Posted by Lo Hill View Post
    How can that be cheating? Its a gamble....just like Blackjack, slots and casino play. Do you get kicked out of a casino if you win a bunch of money?

    If you are going to have the one false start rule, then any time after the gun goes off should be a legal start...no reacting 0.10 seconds after the gun.
    Lo Hill! Long time no see! What an interesting idea.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •